Comparative Concept Similarity over Minspaces: Axiomatisation and Tableaux Calculus
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study the logic of comparative concept similarity CSL introduced by Sheremet, Tishkovsky, Wolter and Zakharyaschev to capture a form of qualitative similarity comparison. In this logic we can formulate assertions of the form ” objects A are more similar to B than to C”. The semantics of this logic is defined by structures equipped with distance functions evaluating the similarity degree of objects. We consider here the particular case of the semantics induced by minspaces, the latter being distance spaces where the minimum of a set of distances always exists. It turns out that the semantics over arbitrary minspaces can be equivalently specified in terms of preferential structures, typical of conditional logics. We first give a direct axiomatisation of this logic over Minspaces. We next define a decision procedure in the form of a tableaux calculus. Both the calculus and the axiomatisation take advantage of the reformulation of the semantics in terms of preferential structures.
منابع مشابه
An axiomatization and a tableau calculus for the logic of comparative concept similarity
Résumé : La logique de similarité comparative des concepts CSL a été introduite en 2005 par Shremet, Tishkowsky, Wolter et Zakharyaschev pour représenter des informations qualitatives sur la similarité entre des concepts, du type “A est plus similaire à B qu’à C”. La sémantique utilise des espaces de distances afin de représenter le degré de similarité entre objets du domaine. Dans cet article,...
متن کاملTableau calculi for CSL over minspaces
The logic of comparative concept similarity CSL has been introduced in 2005 by Shemeret, Tishkovsky, Zakharyashev and Wolter in order to express a kind of qualitative similarity reasoning about concepts in ontologies. The semantics of the logic is defined in terms of distance spaces; however it can be equivalently reformulated in terms of preferential structures, similar to those ones of condit...
متن کاملAxiomatisation of constraint systems to specify a tableaux calculus modulo theories
In this paper we explore a proof-theoretic approach to the combination of generic proof-search and theory-specific procedures, in presence of quantifiers. Forming the basis of tableaux methods, the sequent calculus is refined with meta-variables (a.k.a existential variables or free variables) to delay the choice of witnesses, and parameterised by theory-specific features based on a system of co...
متن کاملRedundancy for rigid clausal tableaux
Redundancy is a substantial concept when avoiding endless computation in theorem proving methods. In this paper, we are targeting a special class of tableau calculi, namely rigid clausal tableaux. These tableaux are (1) clausal in the sense that they consist solely of literals, and are (2) rigid in the sense that they employ rigid variables. Such calculi are e.g. rigid hyper tableaux [7] and mu...
متن کاملCompleteness of Kozen's Axiomatisation of the Propositional mu-Calculus
Propositional μ-calculus is an extension of the propositional modal logic with the least fixpoint operator. In the paper introducing the logic Kozen posed a question about completeness of the axiomatisation which is a small extension of the axiomatisation of the modal system K. It is shown that this axiomatisation is complete.
متن کامل